Getting a traffic ticket resolved does not always mean the same thing. Depending on the allegation, evidence and available court process, an outcome may involve a withdrawal, an amended allegation, a different fine or another resolution permitted by the proceeding. In some matters, the original allegation may remain unchanged.
No traffic-ticket representative can responsibly predict a result before reviewing the ticket and available evidence. We Defend Tickets begins with the document, the response deadline, the driver’s circumstances and the disclosure that becomes available.
Key takeaways
- Every matter turns on its own facts, evidence, deadlines and decision-makers.
- A withdrawal is only one possible outcome; an amended allegation or another resolution may also be relevant.
- Missing information, inconsistencies and procedural issues must be assessed in context and do not automatically end a case.
- Insurance treatment depends on the conviction, driving history and insurer. A representative cannot control or guarantee a premium result.
- The initial review should explain the proposed work, fee and realistic options before the client commits.
“Success” is not one universal number
A single percentage can hide important differences between cases. A withdrawn allegation is not the same as an amended allegation, a changed fine or a matter that proceeds to trial. Combining those outcomes into one marketing number can make the result sound more certain than it is.
We therefore describe outcomes by what happened in the individual matter rather than promising that a new client will receive the same result. Past matters can illustrate the kinds of issues that arise, but they do not predict what a prosecutor, adjudicator or court will decide in another case.
Outcomes that may be available
The options depend on the allegation and the applicable process. They may include:
- a withdrawal or dismissal;
- an amended or reduced allegation;
- a change to the fine or time-to-pay arrangements;
- proceeding to trial; or
- leaving the original allegation and consequences unchanged.
This is not a list of promised results. Some options may not be available in a particular matter.
What the evidence review covers
When retained, the team reviews the material available for the file. Depending on the allegation, that can include the ticket, officer notes, photographs, video, witness information, device records and other disclosure. The review looks for factual issues, inconsistencies, missing information and procedural questions that may matter to the allegation.
An apparent error does not automatically invalidate a ticket. Its importance depends on the law, the rest of the evidence and how the decision-maker treats the issue.
What affects the result
Traffic-ticket outcomes can be affected by:
- the wording of the allegation;
- the response deadline and procedural history;
- the quality and completeness of disclosure;
- the reliability of observations or device evidence;
- the driver’s evidence and surrounding circumstances;
- the positions taken by the prosecutor; and
- the decision of the adjudicator or court.
Because those factors differ, the team provides a case-specific assessment instead of a guaranteed outcome.
The team reviewing the file
We Defend Tickets is led by Stewart Dixon, who has worked with Alberta drivers for more than two decades. The team also includes traffic defence agent Derek Cameron, former police officer Will De Vadder, former Justice of the Peace Melissa Lucy and client-process specialist Kristine Dixon. Their roles and experience are described on the About page.
What happens during the initial review
The initial consultation is free. Send clear images of every page of the ticket and include the response deadline. The team will confirm whether it can assist, explain the proposed scope and fee, and identify the next practical step.
If your ticket was issued in Calgary, review the Calgary traffic-ticket defence process or send the complete ticket through the contact form.
Reviewed by Stewart Dixon, Head of We Defend Tickets · Last reviewed August 7, 2026
This article provides general information, not legal advice. Outcomes depend on the facts, evidence, applicable law and decisions of prosecutors, adjudicators or the court. Past outcomes do not guarantee a similar result.